- Chief architect vs archicad how to#
- Chief architect vs archicad update#
- Chief architect vs archicad software#
I have't been patient enough to use 500? 1000? hours to be "fluent".īut, I can't postpone it anymore. I have been using AutoCAD for many years (99% in 2D), but have been looking into, and tried, apps like CA, AC and various from Autodesk, for many years.Īfter I while a give up. I'm a structural engineer, but my main work are making residential drawings. I have been using both Chief and ArchiCAD since the 90's. Notes schedulers are very needed and missing. You derived your basement, quickly place all predefined items texts with arrows from your basement favorites and you could be done under 2 minutes vs Chief User Items are pretty slow process of placing Notes. I think favorites, with predefined items including text's with arrow and text organized per floor is a great ArchieCAd strength. I do like opportunity to edit value and supply fake dimension value. Everything else in dimensions looks similar. ArchieCad you select dimension line hold control key and click points to add (much faster), Chief - use diamonds, drag diamond to a point or center line that you want dimensioned. it's amazing how you just hover your mouse over an object like a wall or door or window and the object and its various components glowĪrchicad dimensioning is very similar to Chief. > Now, the only thing that I wish Chief did have that Archicad really blows it out of the water with - is the ability to snap to objects in all views, elevation, cross sections etc. Dimensioning is amazing as well.Īt least not for solo residential design. it's amazing how you just hover your mouse over an object like a wall or door or window and the object and its various components glow and give you feedback of what you are snapping to. Now, the only thing that I wish Chief did have that Archicad really blows it out of the water with - is the ability to snap to objects in all views, elevation, cross sections etc. Why do you think they invest so much energy making it collaborative? It's because you can't do it alone!
Chief architect vs archicad update#
You actually need a full time staff to constantly update and create wall types and other items such as cabinets etc.Īrchicad is a team effort type of software.
Infinitely more flexible and powerful but Archicad is a real chore for this type of stuff. Hint - you have to individually set up a new wall type each time. Then search online to see how other guys do it.Īlso for fun try fitting your room with baseboards, crown moldings and chair rails.
Chief architect vs archicad how to#
If you want to include "things that you want to do which Chief wasn't designed to do, but learning how to make Chief do them anyway" as part of the learning curve, then I'd agree that a longer learning curve for Chief is warranted.ĭownload Archicad trial and try designing a kitchen. when your window is between floors.) Most of the difficulty is in doing non-standard stuff, where there isn't a video or reference book. Where Chief is not logical is in trying to get a non-standard project to fit into its "closed rooms" paradigm, and then trying to figure out workarounds.
Also, you are dealing with Model View Options, Pen Sets, Partial Structure Displays, Renovation Filters, Layer intersection groups, Floor Cut Planes, Priorities of Building Materials, Complex Profiles, vast numbers of parametric settings, and a host of other things that have an impact on the graphic representations, but which also can produce stunning results once you've mastered them. It just isn't intuitive or logical to me.įor a new user just starting with AC, I think there are many more tools and palettes to contend with.
Chief architect vs archicad software#
For me, Chief has been the most difficult software product i've ever had to try and learn. However, I am curious about the "steeper learning curve" comment.
0 kommentar(er)
